Happy New Year!
One of the reasons why I blog is because I figure if I've come across something that interests me, that somebody else might find it of value as well. Recently Paul, a fellow New Haven modeler in N-scale, saw one of my clinics on operations and reached out to see if I could help with setting up operations on his layout. Of course I'm happy to. This will be a short series of posts on designing operations for Paul's layout.
This ended up being a very interesting exercise, because the layout is complete and fully scenicked. So there won't be any changes to the layout itself. They have recently downsized, so finding a place for his O-scale models was out. In the end, the best space he could find was the laundry closet. So N-scale it is.
Here's a panorama of the entire layout:
As you can see, the layout is a dogbone, with a yard built between the two sides. There's a single industry at either end, and regardless of the direction, one is trailing point and one is facing point. There are also two tracks for an engine house.
An initial reaction might be that there is very little to work with. A single industry to work in each direction, one runaround, and four yard tracks. I would have liked to see an actual yard lead, instead of having to use the main.
I'm on a lot of Facebook Groups, and I see a lot of 4'x8' layouts, most of which obviously consist of one or more loops, with some industries or yard tracks in the middle. And I see a lot of other folks with the opinion that they can't be operated, or at least not prototypically.
While you can certainly plan ahead for a layout that will be designed specifically for operations, I'm also not going to put down somebody's efforts and layout. Heck, my layout isn't even running right now, and I barely have any scenery after a decade of building it. Who am I to judge?
I'd go so far to say that with a well designed operating scheme, you can make a layout feel more prototypical, even when limited to a loop in a small space. So can I design a relatively prototypical operation with this layout? I think so. I'm going to try anyway.
The first thing I needed to get a handle on here was what options we have for just running trains. The loop is what threw me, since I'm not used to working with that design. At least not since high school, and I wasn't doing any operations then.
Obviously a train can run in either direction around the loop. It would only be able to service one of the industries, unless it uses the runaround to handle the facing point switch. Trains that start running westbound (left on the North Main Line) can service the New Haven Siding, then use the Yard Track as a reversing loop, so they can service the Boston industry.
Next I have to get a handle of what I'm trying to design. The layout is in a closet, and it's DC. So I'm going to start with the assumption it's a single-operator layout.
He has a few blocks so he can park trains if needed while running trains in other sections. That will provide some flexibility. We might need to create additional blocks as we operate the layout, we'll have to see.
He's got a passenger train, a freight train, and several additional locomotives.
But servicing 1-2 industries doesn't do much and would be a very short operating session. Plus, it doesn't utilize the yard much. What can we do with that?
The Yard Lead also forms a reverse loop on the right side (labeled Boston) on the layout, but it only works in one direction. Once you've reversed the train, you can't reverse it back without a runaround move.
I did 4x8 layouts as a kid and initially thought of those looped layouts as a main line with a couple of spurs along the line. First glance certainly confirms that.
THEN I thought of this layout as an industrial area that was looped, and the Puget Sound and Pacific Railroad came to mind. The PS&P services the Port of Grays Harbor in Aberdeen Washington area. The port has a sizable industrial area that is a looped layout with multiple industries inside and outside the loop.
In this case:
1) track 1 can be reoriented to a warehouse complex pulled from both ends,
2) track 2 can be reoriented to main line/run around track,
3) track 3 can have a switch on the left side and be a staging track,
4) the switch at track 4 could be removed and new switches added at each end to create a second yard consisting of tracks 4,5 and 6. Track 4 could be repurposed as a yard lead for an expanded industry where the NH shop now exists.
5) 'Boston siding' could have another switch installed for an expanded grain elevator or flour mill.
6)'New Haven' loop could/should be a mirror image of Boston siding with two smaller industries, and could be serviced by either front or rear yards.
The possibilities are endless. And it doesnt have to be a port! I'm betting theres at least a half dozen terminal railroad prototypes out there in major metro areas that have looped designs.
Just a thought.
PS. With the current reverse loop running through the right side of the existing tracks you have the non prototype action of manually switching the power supply etc. Creating two independent yards removes the reverse loop and the non-prototype thinking.
I'll have to check out the P&SP. But you're right, there are a lot of terminal, industrial or belt railroads that had a complete loop.ReplyDelete
That's a great idea to Turn Track No. 2 into the main line to allow industries on that section of the North Main, something I hadn't considered. I'm always interested in what other folks come up with that I don't think of myself.
I'm hoping this little series will help highlight that there are a LOT more possibilities for operations if you give it some thought. Obviously what I have come up with is far from the only option.
And while I'm approaching this without making changes to the track arrangement for Paul's layout, such insight provides options for other folks designing a similar layout.
Thanks for the input!